Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Philippines Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Immigrants from Philippines
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Immigrants from Philippines
8,836
SOCIAL INDEX
85.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
45th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,107
SOCIAL INDEX
58.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
163rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Philippines Integration in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 189,582,188 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Philippines within Immigrant from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.252. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.081% in Immigrants from Philippines. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia corresponds to a decrease of 81.0 Immigrants from Philippines.
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Philippines Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,770 compared to $44,000, a difference of 17.7%), median male earnings ($62,217 compared to $55,809, a difference of 11.5%), and wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($66,376 compared to $66,161, a difference of 0.33%), median household income ($95,319 compared to $93,899, a difference of 1.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,914 compared to $108,471, a difference of 3.2%).
| Income Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from Philippines |
| Per Capita Income | Exceptional $51,770 | Average $44,000 |
| Median Family Income | Exceptional $116,165 | Exceptional $108,288 |
| Median Household Income | Exceptional $95,319 | Exceptional $93,899 |
| Median Earnings | Exceptional $52,361 | Exceptional $48,266 |
| Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $62,217 | Good $55,809 |
| Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $43,571 | Exceptional $41,114 |
| Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,352 | Exceptional $57,930 |
| Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $106,888 | Exceptional $102,910 |
| Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $111,914 | Exceptional $108,471 |
| Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $66,376 | Exceptional $66,161 |
| Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.3% | Exceptional 24.7% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Philippines Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (16.2% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 15.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 14.6%), and single male poverty (12.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (10.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.27%), child poverty among boys under 16 (14.4% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 0.33%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 0.45%).
| Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from Philippines |
| Poverty | Exceptional 11.0% | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Families | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Males | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Females | Exceptional 11.9% | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.1% | Exceptional 16.7% |
| Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.1% | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Exceptional 14.7% |
| Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.9% | Exceptional 14.3% |
| Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.4% | Exceptional 14.3% |
| Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.2% | Exceptional 14.4% |
| Single Males | Exceptional 12.1% | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Single Females | Exceptional 19.0% | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Single Fathers | Good 16.2% | Exceptional 14.0% |
| Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.4% | Exceptional 26.5% |
| Married Couples | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Excellent 10.4% |
| Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.7% | Good 11.9% |
| Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.6% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Philippines Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 10.3%), female unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 9.1%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.19%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.56%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 0.57%).
| Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from Philippines |
| Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Poor 5.4% |
| Males | Exceptional 5.1% | Poor 5.4% |
| Females | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.5% |
| Youth < 25 | Good 11.5% | Tragic 11.9% |
| Age | 16 to 19 years | Fair 17.8% | Average 17.7% |
| Age | 20 to 24 years | Average 10.3% | Fair 10.4% |
| Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Poor 6.8% |
| Age | 30 to 34 years | Excellent 5.3% | Poor 5.7% |
| Age | 35 to 44 years | Excellent 4.5% | Poor 4.8% |
| Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Average 4.5% |
| Age | 55 to 59 years | Fair 4.8% | Fair 4.9% |
| Age | 60 to 64 years | Fair 4.9% | Tragic 5.0% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Good 5.3% |
| Seniors > 65 | Good 5.1% | Poor 5.2% |
| Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.4% | Poor 8.9% |
| Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.0% | Good 7.5% |
| Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.0% | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.2% | Average 5.4% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Philippines Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 4.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 0.18%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.59%).
| Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from Philippines |
| In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Poor 64.8% | Exceptional 65.6% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Excellent 79.9% | Good 79.8% |
| In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Average 36.6% | Tragic 35.1% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Average 75.0% | Average 75.1% |
| In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.4% | Tragic 84.2% |
| In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.4% | Fair 84.6% |
| In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.8% | Fair 84.2% |
| In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.4% | Good 82.9% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Philippines Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 16.9%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 14.4%), and family households with children (26.2% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.4% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 1.6%), married-couple households (47.8% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 3.2%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 3.4%).
| Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from Philippines |
| Family Households | Tragic 63.4% | Exceptional 68.3% |
| Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.2% | Exceptional 29.0% |
| Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.8% | Exceptional 49.3% |
| Average Family Size | Tragic 3.14 | Exceptional 3.37 |
| Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Fair 2.4% |
| Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.3% | Good 6.1% |
| Currently Married | Exceptional 48.4% | Exceptional 47.6% |
| Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.7% | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 28.4% | Excellent 30.4% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Philippines Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 47.9%), no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 37.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 11.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 28.6%).
| Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from Philippines |
| No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.8% | Exceptional 8.5% |
| 1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.3% | Exceptional 91.5% |
| 2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 54.1% | Exceptional 60.1% |
| 3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 23.8% |
| 4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 8.5% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Philippines Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.8% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 49.2%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 44.9%), and no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 41.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.80%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.80%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.81%).
| Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from Philippines |
| No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.8% | Tragic 2.6% |
| Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.5% |
| Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.4% |
| 1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.4% |
| 2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.3% |
| 3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 97.2% |
| 4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 96.8% |
| 5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Tragic 96.6% |
| 6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Tragic 96.3% |
| 7th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Tragic 94.9% |
| 8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 94.6% |
| 9th Grade | Exceptional 95.7% | Tragic 93.7% |
| 10th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Tragic 92.6% |
| 11th Grade | Exceptional 93.8% | Tragic 91.5% |
| 12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.7% | Tragic 90.2% |
| High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.9% | Tragic 87.8% |
| GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.9% | Poor 84.8% |
| College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 69.6% | Fair 64.8% |
| College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.1% | Fair 58.7% |
| Associate's Degree | Exceptional 51.9% | Poor 45.0% |
| Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 44.0% | Poor 36.4% |
| Master's Degree | Exceptional 18.5% | Tragic 13.6% |
| Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 3.9% |
| Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 1.6% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Philippines Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 10.4%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.1%), and disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.37%), disability (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.85%), and female disability (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.0%).
| Disability Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from Philippines |
| Disability | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Males | Excellent 10.9% | Excellent 10.9% |
| Females | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Age | Under 5 years | Excellent 1.2% | Exceptional 1.2% |
| Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Exceptional 6.2% |
| Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.0% | Good 23.2% |
| Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.1% | Tragic 48.8% |
| Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Hearing | Poor 3.1% | Average 3.0% |
| Cognitive | Exceptional 16.2% | Exceptional 16.7% |
| Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.8% | Excellent 6.0% |
| Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 2.6% |