Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Thai Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Thai
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia

Thais

Excellent
Exceptional
8,836
SOCIAL INDEX
85.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
45th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
10,191
SOCIAL INDEX
99.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
2nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Thai Integration in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 190,717,862 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Thais within Immigrant from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.154. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.231% in Thais. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia corresponds to an increase of 231.2 Thais.
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Integration in Thai Communities

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Thai Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Thai communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($95,319 compared to $110,648, a difference of 16.1%), median male earnings ($62,217 compared to $72,135, a difference of 15.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,914 compared to $129,560, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($51,770 compared to $54,307, a difference of 4.9%), householder income over 65 years ($66,376 compared to $72,099, a difference of 8.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,352 compared to $59,187, a difference of 8.9%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Thai Income
Income MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaThai
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$51,770
Exceptional
$54,307
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$116,165
Exceptional
$131,281
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$95,319
Exceptional
$110,648
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$52,361
Exceptional
$59,237
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$62,217
Exceptional
$72,135
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,571
Exceptional
$47,577
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,352
Exceptional
$59,187
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$106,888
Exceptional
$121,778
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$111,914
Exceptional
$129,560
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$66,376
Exceptional
$72,099
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.3%
Tragic
30.5%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Thai Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Thai communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (14.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 23.1%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 20.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.8% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 7.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 8.6%), and single female poverty (19.0% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 10.1%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Thai Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaThai
Poverty
Exceptional
11.0%
Exceptional
9.6%
Families
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
6.7%
Males
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
8.7%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.1%
Exceptional
17.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Exceptional
10.2%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Exceptional
12.3%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.9%
Exceptional
11.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Exceptional
11.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Exceptional
11.8%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.1%
Exceptional
10.8%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.0%
Exceptional
17.3%
Single Fathers
Good
16.2%
Exceptional
14.5%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.4%
Exceptional
24.5%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
9.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Exceptional
10.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
8.1%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Thai Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Thai communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 15.4%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 14.6%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and female unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.0%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Thai Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaThai
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.6%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Exceptional
11.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Fair
17.8%
Exceptional
15.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Average
10.3%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Exceptional
5.9%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Excellent
4.5%
Exceptional
3.9%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.8%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.4%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.0%
Exceptional
6.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.0%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.2%
Exceptional
4.8%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Thai Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Thai communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 5.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.18%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.42%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Thai Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaThai
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Poor
64.8%
Exceptional
67.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Excellent
79.9%
Exceptional
80.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Average
36.6%
Tragic
34.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Average
75.0%
Tragic
74.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.4%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.4%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.8%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Exceptional
84.3%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Thai Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Thai communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 18.2%), family households with children (26.2% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 16.8%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.8%), average family size (3.14 compared to 3.22, a difference of 2.5%), and currently married (48.4% compared to 50.9%, a difference of 5.2%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Thai Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaThai
Family Households
Tragic
63.4%
Exceptional
67.2%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.2%
Exceptional
30.6%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.8%
Exceptional
51.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.14
Fair
3.22
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
1.9%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.4%
Exceptional
50.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
10.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.4%
Exceptional
24.0%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Thai Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Thai communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 44.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 8.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 7.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 7.3%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Thai Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaThai
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
8.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.3%
Exceptional
91.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
54.1%
Exceptional
57.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.5%
Good
19.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.8%
Fair
6.2%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Thai Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Thai communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (18.5% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 17.1%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 17.0%), and bachelor's degree (44.0% compared to 50.1%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.020%), 6th grade (97.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.020%), and 7th grade (96.6% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.020%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Thai Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaThai
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Exceptional
95.8%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.7%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.8%
Exceptional
94.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.7%
Exceptional
93.2%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Exceptional
91.5%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.9%
Exceptional
89.1%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.6%
Exceptional
73.4%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.1%
Exceptional
68.6%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.9%
Exceptional
57.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
44.0%
Exceptional
50.1%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
18.5%
Exceptional
21.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
6.1%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
2.8%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Thai Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Thai communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 22.2%), ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 18.3%), and male disability (10.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.2% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 0.58%), disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 0.63%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 4.6%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Thai Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaThai
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
9.7%
Males
Excellent
10.9%
Exceptional
9.2%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Excellent
1.2%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Exceptional
5.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
8.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.0%
Exceptional
20.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.1%
Exceptional
45.4%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
1.7%
Hearing
Poor
3.1%
Exceptional
2.5%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.2%
Exceptional
16.1%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
4.9%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
2.1%