Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Taiwanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,011,972 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Taiwanese within Immigrant from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.399. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.179% in Taiwanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia corresponds to an increase of 178.8 Taiwanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($62,217 compared to $55,556, a difference of 12.0%), per capita income ($51,770 compared to $46,455, a difference of 11.4%), and median earnings ($52,361 compared to $47,902, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($106,888 compared to $101,492, a difference of 5.3%), householder income over 65 years ($66,376 compared to $62,894, a difference of 5.5%), and median household income ($95,319 compared to $89,900, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 14.6%), single father poverty (16.2% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 13.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (27.4% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.58%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.8% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and single female poverty (19.0% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 39.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 28.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.85%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 8.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.96%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.040%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 8.2%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 8.1%), and currently married (48.4% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.4% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 0.14%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households with children (26.2% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 21.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 8.4%), and no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.12%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 0.44%), and no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 36.8%), professional degree (5.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 16.9%), and master's degree (18.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.68%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.69%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 11.5%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 10.1%), and cognitive disability (16.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 1.3%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and female disability (11.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.0%).