Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Marshallese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 10,636,893 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Marshallese within Immigrant from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.825. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 2.564% in Marshallese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia corresponds to an increase of 2,563.7 Marshallese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,770 compared to $39,108, a difference of 32.4%), median male earnings ($62,217 compared to $48,137, a difference of 29.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($106,888 compared to $83,575, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($66,376 compared to $65,874, a difference of 0.76%), householder income under 25 years ($54,352 compared to $50,627, a difference of 7.4%), and wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 16.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 46.1%), single male poverty (12.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 36.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.8% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 33.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.9%), single father poverty (16.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 4.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 37.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 36.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.61%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 39.5%, a difference of 7.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.85%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 22.4%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 19.7%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.2% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 0.12%), family households (63.4% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 0.49%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 41.0%), no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 20.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 54.9%, a difference of 1.5%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 15.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 61.9%), master's degree (18.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 60.3%), and professional degree (5.8% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 55.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.14%), 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.14%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.94%, a difference of 27.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 25.7%), and hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 8.9%), cognitive disability (16.2% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 9.3%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 10.2%).