Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Immigrants from Northern Africa
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Immigrants from Northern Africa
8,836
SOCIAL INDEX
85.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
45th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,346
SOCIAL INDEX
70.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
121st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Northern Africa Integration in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 162,807,758 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa within Immigrant from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.576. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.564% in Immigrants from Northern Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia corresponds to an increase of 564.2 Immigrants from Northern Africa.
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,770 compared to $46,531, a difference of 11.3%), wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 8.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($106,888 compared to $99,232, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,352 compared to $53,185, a difference of 2.2%), median female earnings ($43,571 compared to $42,084, a difference of 3.5%), and median earnings ($52,361 compared to $49,648, a difference of 5.5%).
| Income Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from Northern Africa |
| Per Capita Income | Exceptional $51,770 | Exceptional $46,531 |
| Median Family Income | Exceptional $116,165 | Exceptional $108,161 |
| Median Household Income | Exceptional $95,319 | Exceptional $90,026 |
| Median Earnings | Exceptional $52,361 | Exceptional $49,648 |
| Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $62,217 | Exceptional $58,008 |
| Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $43,571 | Exceptional $42,084 |
| Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,352 | Exceptional $53,185 |
| Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $106,888 | Exceptional $99,232 |
| Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $111,914 | Exceptional $105,430 |
| Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $66,376 | Excellent $62,522 |
| Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.3% | Good 25.2% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 14.7%), receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 14.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.9% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.2%), single mother poverty (27.4% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 3.1%).
| Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from Northern Africa |
| Poverty | Exceptional 11.0% | Good 12.1% |
| Families | Exceptional 7.7% | Good 8.8% |
| Males | Exceptional 10.0% | Average 11.1% |
| Females | Exceptional 11.9% | Good 13.2% |
| Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.1% | Excellent 19.7% |
| Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.1% | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Excellent 16.4% |
| Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.9% | Good 15.8% |
| Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.4% | Good 16.0% |
| Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.2% | Good 16.0% |
| Single Males | Exceptional 12.1% | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Single Females | Exceptional 19.0% | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Single Fathers | Good 16.2% | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.4% | Exceptional 28.0% |
| Married Couples | Exceptional 4.6% | Average 5.2% |
| Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Average 11.0% |
| Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.7% | Fair 12.5% |
| Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.6% | Excellent 11.0% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 5.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 5.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.20%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.53%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.4%).
| Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from Northern Africa |
| Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Good 5.2% |
| Males | Exceptional 5.1% | Good 5.2% |
| Females | Exceptional 5.0% | Good 5.2% |
| Youth < 25 | Good 11.5% | Good 11.5% |
| Age | 16 to 19 years | Fair 17.8% | Good 17.4% |
| Age | 20 to 24 years | Average 10.3% | Excellent 10.2% |
| Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Exceptional 6.3% |
| Age | 30 to 34 years | Excellent 5.3% | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Age | 35 to 44 years | Excellent 4.5% | Excellent 4.5% |
| Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Average 4.5% |
| Age | 55 to 59 years | Fair 4.8% | Good 4.8% |
| Age | 60 to 64 years | Fair 4.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Poor 5.5% |
| Seniors > 65 | Good 5.1% | Poor 5.2% |
| Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.4% | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.0% | Excellent 7.4% |
| Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.0% | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.2% | Average 5.4% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.48%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.090%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from Northern Africa |
| In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Poor 64.8% | Exceptional 66.6% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Excellent 79.9% | Exceptional 80.3% |
| In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Average 36.6% | Poor 35.9% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Average 75.0% | Poor 74.6% |
| In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.4% | Exceptional 85.2% |
| In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.4% | Exceptional 85.2% |
| In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.8% | Exceptional 84.8% |
| In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.4% | Exceptional 83.3% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 16.1%), family households with children (26.2% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 6.1%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.4% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 0.14%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and average family size (3.14 compared to 3.22, a difference of 2.6%).
| Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from Northern Africa |
| Family Households | Tragic 63.4% | Tragic 63.5% |
| Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.2% | Exceptional 27.8% |
| Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.8% | Fair 46.0% |
| Average Family Size | Tragic 3.14 | Average 3.22 |
| Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.3% | Good 6.2% |
| Currently Married | Exceptional 48.4% | Fair 46.5% |
| Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.7% | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 28.4% | Exceptional 29.5% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 7.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 3.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 52.3%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 1.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 52.3%, a difference of 3.4%).
| Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from Northern Africa |
| No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 12.6% |
| 1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.3% | Tragic 87.4% |
| 2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 54.1% | Tragic 52.3% |
| 3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 17.8% |
| 4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 5.6% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 20.3%), professional degree (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 15.0%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.41%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.41%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.42%).
| Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from Northern Africa |
| No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.8% | Poor 2.2% |
| Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Poor 97.8% |
| Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Poor 97.8% |
| 1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Poor 97.8% |
| 2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Poor 97.7% |
| 3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Poor 97.6% |
| 4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Poor 97.4% |
| 5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Poor 97.2% |
| 6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Poor 96.9% |
| 7th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Fair 95.8% |
| 8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Fair 95.5% |
| 9th Grade | Exceptional 95.7% | Fair 94.7% |
| 10th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Average 93.7% |
| 11th Grade | Exceptional 93.8% | Average 92.6% |
| 12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.7% | Good 91.4% |
| High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.9% | Good 89.4% |
| GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.9% | Good 86.3% |
| College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 69.6% | Exceptional 67.2% |
| College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.1% | Exceptional 61.9% |
| Associate's Degree | Exceptional 51.9% | Exceptional 49.7% |
| Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 44.0% | Exceptional 41.9% |
| Master's Degree | Exceptional 18.5% | Exceptional 17.1% |
| Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.8% | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.4% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 13.0%), cognitive disability (16.2% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 6.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.10%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.33%), and female disability (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Disability Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from Northern Africa |
| Disability | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Males | Excellent 10.9% | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Females | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Age | Under 5 years | Excellent 1.2% | Exceptional 1.2% |
| Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Exceptional 6.1% |
| Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.0% | Exceptional 22.4% |
| Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.1% | Exceptional 46.7% |
| Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Hearing | Poor 3.1% | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Cognitive | Exceptional 16.2% | Average 17.3% |
| Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.8% | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Exceptional 2.3% |