Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Filipino Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,970,048 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Filipinos within Immigrant from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.023. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Filipinos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia corresponds to a decrease of 5.8 Filipinos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($95,319 compared to $115,509, a difference of 21.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,914 compared to $134,910, a difference of 20.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($106,888 compared to $128,723, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,352 compared to $57,740, a difference of 6.2%), wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 8.9%), and median female earnings ($43,571 compared to $49,508, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 30.4%), child poverty among boys under 16 (14.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 29.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 0.59%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 19.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 14.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 15.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 71.4%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.12%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 23.6%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 18.0%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.14 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.9%), currently married (48.4% compared to 49.7%, a difference of 2.8%), and family households (63.4% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 19.7%), no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 13.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 6.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 45.4%), professional degree (5.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 29.9%), and master's degree (18.5% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.7% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 0.030%), 9th grade (95.7% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.060%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.16%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 23.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 19.9%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 0.67%), cognitive disability (16.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 9.3%).