Immigrants from Central America vs Nepalese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,472,333 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Nepalese within Immigrant from Central America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.132. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Central America within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Nepalese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Central America corresponds to an increase of 2.9 Nepalese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,012 compared to $91,498, a difference of 14.3%), median female earnings ($33,953 compared to $38,603, a difference of 13.7%), and median household income ($74,217 compared to $82,410, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,022 compared to $54,472, a difference of 6.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,965 compared to $93,355, a difference of 8.6%), and median male earnings ($45,538 compared to $49,458, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 20.2%), single male poverty (13.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 18.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 0.010%), receiving food stamps (15.0% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 2.7%), and male poverty (13.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 22.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 17.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 0.66%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.89%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.0% compared to 33.5%, a difference of 4.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.72%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (77.7% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.5% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 0.30%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.4% compared to 33.5%, a difference of 11.7%), single mother households (8.1% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 8.0%), and single father households (3.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.7% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 0.19%), currently married (44.1% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and family households with children (31.0% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 20.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.4% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 6.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 1.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 3.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in college, under 1 year (54.4% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 14.3%), college, 1 year or more (48.5% compared to 54.9%, a difference of 13.3%), and professional degree (2.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (95.8% compared to 95.9%, a difference of 0.060%), 2nd grade (96.2% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.11%), and 1st grade (96.3% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.97%, a difference of 26.1%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 12.4%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.82%), cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and disability age over 75 (50.5% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 4.0%).