Immigrants from Central America vs Marshallese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 14,670,928 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Marshallese within Immigrant from Central America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.115. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Central America within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Marshallese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Central America corresponds to a decrease of 2.8 Marshallese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($53,420 compared to $65,874, a difference of 23.3%), median family income ($85,050 compared to $95,293, a difference of 12.0%), and per capita income ($34,974 compared to $39,108, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,022 compared to $50,627, a difference of 0.78%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,012 compared to $83,575, a difference of 4.4%), and wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 42.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 39.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 3.6%), single mother poverty (33.6% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 4.6%), and single father poverty (16.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 43.0%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 17.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.0% compared to 39.5%, a difference of 12.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.5% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.0% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 0.54%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.7% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 27.0%), single father households (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 23.3%), and family households with children (31.0% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.77%), married-couple households (45.7% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and currently married (44.1% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (23.4% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 10.1%), no vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 10.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 54.9%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.79%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 4.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 54.9%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 82.8%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 30.8%), and doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (96.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.94%, a difference of 31.0%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 29.0%), and male disability (11.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 0.11%), disability age over 75 (50.5% compared to 50.1%, a difference of 0.94%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.1%).