Immigrants from Central America vs Venezuelan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 299,416,559 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Venezuelans within Immigrant from Central America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.572. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Central America within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Venezuelans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Central America corresponds to a decrease of 7.4 Venezuelans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Venezuelan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($34,974 compared to $42,074, a difference of 20.3%), median male earnings ($45,538 compared to $52,510, a difference of 15.3%), and median family income ($85,050 compared to $96,281, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,022 compared to $50,011, a difference of 2.0%), wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 6.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,420 compared to $58,026, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Venezuelan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (21.3% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 36.2%), child poverty among girls under 16 (21.4% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 35.6%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (21.3% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 35.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 3.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.0% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 5.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Venezuelan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 31.2%), male unemployment (5.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 28.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Venezuelan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 4.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.7% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.0% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.5% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Venezuelan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 32.8%), single mother households (8.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 21.2%), and births to unmarried women (37.4% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (68.3% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 2.7%), married-couple households (45.7% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 4.3%), and family households with children (31.0% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Venezuelan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 58.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.4% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 30.2%), and no vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.86%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 4.4%), and no vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Venezuelan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 81.9%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 71.7%), and master's degree (10.0% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 59.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (96.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Venezuelan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 26.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (26.6% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 22.2%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.3%), and cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 6.8%).