Alaska Native vs Immigrants from Philippines Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 74,688,870 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Philippines within Alaska Native communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.210. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaska Natives within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.056% in Immigrants from Philippines. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaska Natives corresponds to a decrease of 55.8 Immigrants from Philippines.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($79,509 compared to $93,899, a difference of 18.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,018 compared to $102,910, a difference of 16.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,991 compared to $108,471, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 1.1%), householder income under 25 years ($54,000 compared to $57,930, a difference of 7.3%), and median female earnings ($38,202 compared to $41,114, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 46.5%), single male poverty (15.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 41.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 39.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 4.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 4.2%), and single mother poverty (30.9% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 16.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (14.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 64.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (7.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 51.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (8.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 50.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 20.6%), female unemployment (6.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 20.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 22.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 11.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.3% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.0% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 47.3%), births to unmarried women (38.3% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 25.8%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.37 compared to 3.37, a difference of 0.010%), family households with children (29.9% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and currently married (45.5% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 103.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 16.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.8% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 9.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.6% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 12.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 13.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 74.9%), bachelor's degree (29.4% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 24.1%), and associate's degree (37.5% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.090%), nursery school (98.8% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and kindergarten (98.7% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 152.4%), hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 49.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 39.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.3%), cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 4.9%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 6.4%).