Alaska Native vs Arapaho Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,765,735 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Alaska Native communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.043. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaska Natives within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.008% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaska Natives corresponds to an increase of 8.0 Arapaho.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,991 compared to $75,945, a difference of 23.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,018 compared to $71,697, a difference of 22.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,000 compared to $44,003, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($60,748 compared to $59,383, a difference of 2.3%), wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 4.1%), and median family income ($95,573 compared to $82,064, a difference of 16.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (15.4% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 42.3%), single father poverty (18.1% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 32.4%), and family poverty (10.4% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 5.9%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 6.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.6% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 98.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (14.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 81.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 63.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 3.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (13.2% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (14.9% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (81.6% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 6.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.3% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.0% compared to 74.4%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.3% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 23.0%), single father households (3.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 20.7%), and divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.1% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 2.2%), single mother households (7.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 4.0%), and average family size (3.37 compared to 3.64, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 136.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 27.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.8% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 10.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.6% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 12.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 26.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 42.8%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 23.4%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.7% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.14%), 1st grade (98.7% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.14%), and nursery school (98.8% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 131.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 27.4%), and ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (13.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 0.36%), male disability (13.6% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and female disability (12.8% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 2.1%).