Alaska Native vs Central American Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 75,526,708 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Central Americans within Alaska Native communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.826. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaska Natives within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.155% in Central Americans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaska Natives corresponds to an increase of 154.8 Central Americans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Central American communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($60,748 compared to $56,321, a difference of 7.9%), wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 5.7%), and median family income ($95,573 compared to $91,087, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($79,509 compared to $78,803, a difference of 0.90%), per capita income ($39,558 compared to $38,560, a difference of 2.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,000 compared to $52,626, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Central American communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 28.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 23.5%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (16.8% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (23.3% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 1.3%), single mother poverty (30.9% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 2.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (19.6% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Central American communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (14.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 67.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (7.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 46.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (10.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 45.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 7.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 9.7%), and female unemployment (6.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Central American communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 12.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.3% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.0% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Central American communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 22.7%), currently married (45.5% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 5.1%), and births to unmarried women (38.3% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.37 compared to 3.41, a difference of 1.1%), family households (65.1% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Central American communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 61.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (83.8% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 6.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.6% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 2.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Central American communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 130.4%), high school diploma (89.9% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 8.9%), and bachelor's degree (29.4% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 1.1%), nursery school (98.8% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and kindergarten (98.7% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Central American communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 149.4%), hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 64.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 0.63%), ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 2.3%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 4.9%).