Alaska Native vs Immigrants from Fiji Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,022,498 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Fiji within Alaska Native communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.564. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaska Natives within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.088% in Immigrants from Fiji. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaska Natives corresponds to an increase of 87.7 Immigrants from Fiji.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($79,509 compared to $93,933, a difference of 18.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,018 compared to $103,954, a difference of 18.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,991 compared to $106,952, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,000 compared to $57,074, a difference of 5.7%), householder income over 65 years ($60,748 compared to $64,795, a difference of 6.7%), and per capita income ($39,558 compared to $42,694, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (15.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 41.5%), single father poverty (18.1% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 36.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 30.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 6.4%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (16.8% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (7.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 50.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (8.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 47.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (14.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 46.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (6.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 15.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 16.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 20.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 15.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.3% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.6% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 0.27%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.43%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.6% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.3% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 31.3%), single father households (3.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 28.8%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (45.5% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 1.4%), family households with children (29.9% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and average family size (3.37 compared to 3.45, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 122.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 31.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.8% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 10.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.6% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 16.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 24.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 138.0%), bachelor's degree (29.4% compared to 33.7%, a difference of 14.9%), and associate's degree (37.5% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.8% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 2.3%), kindergarten (98.7% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and 1st grade (98.7% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.9% compared to 0.92%, a difference of 220.8%), hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 52.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 1.1%), ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and female disability (12.8% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 4.3%).