Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Puget Sound Salish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 33,201,927 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Puget Sound Salish within Immigrant from Nicaragua communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.482. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Nicaragua within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.071% in Puget Sound Salish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Nicaragua corresponds to an increase of 71.0 Puget Sound Salish.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($52,085 compared to $59,934, a difference of 15.1%), median male earnings ($47,482 compared to $53,704, a difference of 13.1%), and median earnings ($41,737 compared to $46,333, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,266 compared to $55,543, a difference of 4.3%), per capita income ($38,065 compared to $41,495, a difference of 9.0%), and median female earnings ($36,023 compared to $39,376, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (17.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 63.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 57.5%), and married-couple family poverty (7.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 45.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 0.58%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.8% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 28.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 25.8%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.6% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 23.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.9% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.9% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.66%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.7% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.0% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 24.8%), single mother households (7.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 18.8%), and currently married (43.7% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (13.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 0.36%), single father households (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 38.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 30.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.4% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.46%), no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 4.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.4% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 71.1%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 21.1%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (40.3% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 0.63%), nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 47.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 46.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 32.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 3.3%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 4.3%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 5.0%).