Immigrants from Latin America vs Puget Sound Salish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,036,636 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Puget Sound Salish within Immigrant from Latin America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.515. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Latin America within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Puget Sound Salish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Latin America corresponds to a decrease of 4.4 Puget Sound Salish.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($46,941 compared to $53,704, a difference of 14.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,166 compared to $93,661, a difference of 14.0%), and median earnings ($41,049 compared to $46,333, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.7% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 6.8%), householder income under 25 years ($51,387 compared to $55,543, a difference of 8.1%), and median household income ($75,420 compared to $84,011, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 47.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 45.4%), and family poverty (11.8% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 40.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 5.9%), single father poverty (16.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 8.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 28.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 24.5%), and female unemployment (6.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.46%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.4% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.9% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 15.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (78.3% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.090%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 26.5%), births to unmarried women (37.1% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 22.1%), and currently married (43.8% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.2% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 2.5%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 3.9%), and married-couple households (44.7% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 31.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 28.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.76%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 8.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 14.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 83.1%), college, under 1 year (56.3% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 13.5%), and college, 1 year or more (50.7% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (11.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.2%), nursery school (96.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and kindergarten (96.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 39.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 32.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.97%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.090%), disability age over 75 (49.5% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 0.57%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.1%).