Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Puget Sound Salish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 27,061,992 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Puget Sound Salish within Immigrant from Uzbekistan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.437. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uzbekistan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.161% in Puget Sound Salish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uzbekistan corresponds to an increase of 161.3 Puget Sound Salish.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,929 compared to $41,495, a difference of 13.1%), wage/income gap (22.7% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 11.5%), and median female earnings ($43,363 compared to $39,376, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,846 compared to $55,543, a difference of 1.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($100,523 compared to $98,340, a difference of 2.2%), and median household income ($86,425 compared to $84,011, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.5% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 53.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 38.8%), and married-couple family poverty (6.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 36.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.3% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 0.60%), single father poverty (15.0% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 0.97%), and single female poverty (20.3% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 38.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 20.6%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (29.2% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 34.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (70.4% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 10.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.51%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 0.65%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 0.97%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 48.0%), divorced or separated (11.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 20.5%), and births to unmarried women (25.8% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.9% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 1.4%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.17, a difference of 2.2%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (26.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 180.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 158.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 120.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (73.4% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 23.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (37.9% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 63.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 120.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 68.1%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 64.9%), and master's degree (17.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 60.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.6% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.64%), nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.85%), and kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (5.5% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 51.0%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 46.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 32.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.2% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 1.3%), self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 2.5%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 5.3%).