Immigrants from South America vs Puget Sound Salish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,023,555 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Puget Sound Salish within Immigrant from South America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.090. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South America within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Puget Sound Salish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South America corresponds to a decrease of 3.1 Puget Sound Salish.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,068 compared to $41,495, a difference of 6.2%), wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and median family income ($100,414 compared to $97,958, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($94,042 compared to $93,661, a difference of 0.41%), median earnings ($46,548 compared to $46,333, a difference of 0.46%), and median male earnings ($53,962 compared to $53,704, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 34.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 26.1%), and married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 0.49%), single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 25.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 15.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.7% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.3% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 17.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 17.9%), divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 9.2%), and single mother households (6.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.6% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.050%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and average family size (3.27 compared to 3.17, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 80.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.7% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 57.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (50.2% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 1.9%), no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 18.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (50.2% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 23.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 50.5%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 46.3%), and master's degree (15.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 39.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (63.8% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 0.27%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.71%), and kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 48.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 43.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 34.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 4.8%), disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 6.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 13.8%).