Crow vs Puget Sound Salish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 20,123,007 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Puget Sound Salish within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.013. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Puget Sound Salish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to an increase of 0.2 Puget Sound Salish.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.1% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 33.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,257 compared to $98,340, a difference of 32.4%), and median household income ($63,681 compared to $84,011, a difference of 31.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $39,376, a difference of 11.7%), householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $55,543, a difference of 18.1%), and median earnings ($38,707 compared to $46,333, a difference of 19.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (30.3% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 99.8%), married-couple family poverty (9.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 96.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (31.0% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 93.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 2.4%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 32.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 48.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (15.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 239.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 234.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 233.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 8.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 23.4%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 33.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 8.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 8.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.3% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (40.4% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 32.6%), single father households (3.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 30.8%), and average family size (3.82 compared to 3.17, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.24%), family households (65.3% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.49%), and divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 20.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 17.3%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 11.3%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 15.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 22.9%), bachelor's degree (27.7% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 10.5%), and no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.7% compared to 94.7%, a difference of 0.0%), 9th grade (96.1% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 0.35%), and 11th grade (92.9% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.97%, a difference of 27.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 13.0%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.6% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 0.44%), ambulatory disability (6.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 0.54%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 0.66%).