Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Puget Sound Salish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 32,719,578 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Puget Sound Salish within Immigrant from Costa Rica communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.243. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Costa Rica within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.242% in Puget Sound Salish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Costa Rica corresponds to an increase of 241.5 Puget Sound Salish.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($52,643 compared to $55,543, a difference of 5.5%), per capita income ($43,464 compared to $41,495, a difference of 4.8%), and median family income ($101,354 compared to $97,958, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($59,848 compared to $59,934, a difference of 0.14%), median female earnings ($39,186 compared to $39,376, a difference of 0.49%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($92,876 compared to $93,661, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 23.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 16.9%), and family poverty (9.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.2% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 0.30%), single female poverty (20.9% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 19.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 17.0%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 9.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 12.0%), births to unmarried women (33.4% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 9.6%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.6% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.010%), married-couple households (46.3% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and average family size (3.26 compared to 3.17, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 44.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 34.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.4% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.80%), no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 7.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.4% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 11.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 48.3%), professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 42.4%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.54%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.56%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 37.2%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.97%, a difference of 35.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 32.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 3.4%), disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 6.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 10.6%).