Cherokee vs Puget Sound Salish Community Comparison

COMPARE

Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Puget Sound Salish
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Cherokee

Puget Sound Salish

Fair
Average
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,672
SOCIAL INDEX
54.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
172nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Puget Sound Salish Integration in Cherokee Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,498,258 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Puget Sound Salish within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.212. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.207% in Puget Sound Salish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to an increase of 207.4 Puget Sound Salish.
Cherokee Integration in Puget Sound Salish Communities

Cherokee vs Puget Sound Salish Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($47,848 compared to $55,543, a difference of 16.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,843 compared to $93,661, a difference of 15.9%), and median household income ($72,682 compared to $84,011, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 8.2%), median male earnings ($48,669 compared to $53,704, a difference of 10.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,133 compared to $59,934, a difference of 10.7%).
Cherokee vs Puget Sound Salish Income
Income MetricCherokeePuget Sound Salish
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,203
Tragic
$41,495
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,209
Tragic
$97,958
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,682
Fair
$84,011
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,252
Average
$46,333
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,669
Fair
$53,704
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,742
Fair
$39,376
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,848
Exceptional
$55,543
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,843
Fair
$93,661
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,125
Fair
$98,340
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,133
Fair
$59,934
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Good
25.3%

Cherokee vs Puget Sound Salish Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.7% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 35.6%), single father poverty (19.6% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 29.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.9% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 1.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 8.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 11.8%).
Cherokee vs Puget Sound Salish Poverty
Poverty MetricCherokeePuget Sound Salish
Poverty
Tragic
14.4%
Excellent
11.7%
Families
Tragic
10.6%
Excellent
8.4%
Males
Tragic
13.1%
Excellent
10.7%
Females
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
12.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.7%
Exceptional
18.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.2%
Tragic
14.3%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.7%
Exceptional
16.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Excellent
15.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.7%
Good
15.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Exceptional
15.4%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Average
12.8%
Single Females
Tragic
25.7%
Good
20.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
15.2%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.5%
Average
29.1%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
11.0%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
10.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
13.1%

Cherokee vs Puget Sound Salish Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 34.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 25.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.46%), male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 1.3%).
Cherokee vs Puget Sound Salish Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCherokeePuget Sound Salish
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Average
5.2%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
5.5%
Females
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Youth < 25
Fair
11.8%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
17.9%
Tragic
18.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.5%
Tragic
10.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.6%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.2%
Good
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Poor
4.6%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.8%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.3%
Average
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Exceptional
7.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
5.1%

Cherokee vs Puget Sound Salish Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 3.5%), in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (61.9% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.6% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 0.61%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.4% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.9%).
Cherokee vs Puget Sound Salish Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCherokeePuget Sound Salish
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.9%
Tragic
63.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Tragic
78.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.2%
Exceptional
39.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.9%
Exceptional
78.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.1%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.6%
Tragic
82.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.4%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Tragic
81.7%

Cherokee vs Puget Sound Salish Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 20.5%), single mother households (6.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 9.0%), and divorced or separated (13.7% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.23%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.17, a difference of 0.45%), and family households (65.0% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.0%).
Cherokee vs Puget Sound Salish Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCherokeePuget Sound Salish
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Exceptional
65.6%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.5%
Average
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.7%
Exceptional
47.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Tragic
3.17
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.7%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.8%
Average
6.3%
Currently Married
Good
46.9%
Exceptional
47.6%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.7%
Tragic
13.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.7%
Excellent
30.4%

Cherokee vs Puget Sound Salish Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 23.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 21.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 3.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 14.7%).
Cherokee vs Puget Sound Salish Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCherokeePuget Sound Salish
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
9.5%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.4%
Exceptional
90.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.9%
Exceptional
62.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Exceptional
26.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
9.4%

Cherokee vs Puget Sound Salish Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 20.9%), professional degree (3.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 7.0%), and college, under 1 year (60.1% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.5% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.050%), 7th grade (96.8% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.070%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.080%).
Cherokee vs Puget Sound Salish Education Level
Education Level MetricCherokeePuget Sound Salish
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Exceptional
94.7%
11th Grade
Average
92.4%
Exceptional
93.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.5%
Exceptional
92.0%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.5%
Excellent
89.9%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.9%
Fair
85.2%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.1%
Poor
63.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.2%
Tragic
55.9%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.9%
Tragic
40.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Tragic
30.7%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Tragic
11.1%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Tragic
3.1%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.2%

Cherokee vs Puget Sound Salish Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 0.97%, a difference of 82.2%), vision disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 18.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 0.82%), self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 2.5%).
Cherokee vs Puget Sound Salish Disability
Disability MetricCherokeePuget Sound Salish
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
13.7%
Males
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
13.5%
Females
Tragic
14.9%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.8%
Exceptional
0.97%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
6.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.7%
Tragic
8.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.5%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
28.2%
Tragic
27.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.2%
Tragic
49.8%
Vision
Tragic
2.9%
Tragic
2.5%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Tragic
3.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Poor
17.5%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.9%
Tragic
6.9%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Tragic
2.8%