Immigrants from Liberia vs Puget Sound Salish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 28,233,752 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Puget Sound Salish within Immigrant from Liberia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.346. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Liberia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.030% in Puget Sound Salish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Liberia corresponds to a decrease of 30.2 Puget Sound Salish.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (20.6% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 23.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,863 compared to $93,661, a difference of 15.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,981 compared to $55,543, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($37,970 compared to $39,376, a difference of 3.7%), median earnings ($42,923 compared to $46,333, a difference of 7.9%), and median family income ($90,450 compared to $97,958, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (20.2% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 31.2%), family poverty (10.8% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 28.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.7% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.54%), single mother poverty (30.1% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 3.6%), and single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 37.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 19.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.6% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 6.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (41.5% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.7% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.9% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 39.3%), births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 23.6%), and married-couple households (40.3% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.9%), average family size (3.27 compared to 3.17, a difference of 3.2%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 75.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 54.2%), and no vehicles in household (12.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.8% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.3% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 20.9%), and no vehicles in household (12.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 28.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 37.6%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 23.8%), and master's degree (12.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (55.7% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 0.44%), nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.74%), and kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 0.97%, a difference of 42.2%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 39.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.080%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 0.56%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.5%).