Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Puget Sound Salish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 31,860,294 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Puget Sound Salish within Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.463. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Trinidadians and Tobagonians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.081% in Puget Sound Salish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Trinidadians and Tobagonians corresponds to an increase of 80.6 Puget Sound Salish.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.3% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 31.2%), householder income over 65 years ($55,327 compared to $59,934, a difference of 8.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,357 compared to $98,340, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($41,655 compared to $41,495, a difference of 0.39%), median earnings ($45,820 compared to $46,333, a difference of 1.1%), and median family income ($94,466 compared to $97,958, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 47.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 40.5%), and family poverty (10.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 30.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.2% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 0.48%), single mother poverty (29.6% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and single male poverty (13.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 28.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 21.7%), and unemployment (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 4.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.9% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 26.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.5% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 9.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.9% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 0.28%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.50%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.0% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 0.97%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 23.5%), single mother households (7.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 23.4%), and births to unmarried women (36.5% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.6% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 3.1%), family households with children (26.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 3.9%), and average family size (3.32 compared to 3.17, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (23.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 149.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 120.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 93.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.3% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 18.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.9% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 51.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 93.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 44.6%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 29.8%), and master's degree (14.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (55.8% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 0.090%), nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.87%), and kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 58.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 39.1%), and male disability (11.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 1.9%), disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 4.4%), and ambulatory disability (6.6% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 4.8%).