Native Hawaiian vs Immigrants from Moldova Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,585,757 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Moldova within Native Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.382. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Native Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Immigrants from Moldova. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Native Hawaiians corresponds to a decrease of 7.1 Immigrants from Moldova.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,017 compared to $47,489, a difference of 15.8%), median male earnings ($52,306 compared to $59,417, a difference of 13.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($71,021 compared to $62,939, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($89,919 compared to $91,446, a difference of 1.7%), householder income under 25 years ($55,158 compared to $56,168, a difference of 1.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,149 compared to $107,357, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 18.4%), receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 17.6%), and single male poverty (12.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.9% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 0.030%), married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 23.6%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 22.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 0.26%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 0.85%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 0.98%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.3% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 25.7%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 16.9%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.85%), currently married (47.9% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and married-couple households (49.1% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 57.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 30.8%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 9.4%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 27.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (12.3% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 35.4%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 28.1%), and no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.6% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.0%), high school diploma (90.8% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 0.080%), and 11th grade (93.9% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 22.3%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 17.6%), and male disability (12.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.050%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.18%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.31%).