Native Hawaiian vs Immigrants from Dominica Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 67,047,108 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Dominica within Native Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.583. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Native Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Immigrants from Dominica. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Native Hawaiians corresponds to a decrease of 5.0 Immigrants from Dominica.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Dominica communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($71,021 compared to $50,071, a difference of 41.8%), wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 27.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,149 compared to $83,311, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,461 compared to $37,825, a difference of 1.7%), median earnings ($45,027 compared to $42,420, a difference of 6.1%), and per capita income ($41,017 compared to $37,952, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Dominica communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 68.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 64.4%), and married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 53.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 32.5%, a difference of 14.2%), single male poverty (12.6% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 14.9%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 19.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Dominica communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 32.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 31.9%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 5.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 6.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Dominica communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 32.5%, a difference of 15.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.45%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.54%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Dominica communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 42.7%), married-couple households (49.1% compared to 39.4%, a difference of 24.7%), and currently married (47.9% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.90%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and average family size (3.43 compared to 3.32, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Dominica communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 189.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 124.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 81.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 77.8%, a difference of 18.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 41.6%, a difference of 47.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 81.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Dominica communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 78.8%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 14.3%), and college, under 1 year (63.9% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Dominica communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 39.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 21.5%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (12.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.67%), disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 4.1%).