Native Hawaiian vs Immigrants from Caribbean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 294,282,088 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Caribbean within Native Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.431. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Native Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in Immigrants from Caribbean. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Native Hawaiians corresponds to a decrease of 9.3 Immigrants from Caribbean.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($71,021 compared to $48,535, a difference of 46.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,149 compared to $82,513, a difference of 27.4%), and median family income ($104,910 compared to $83,319, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,461 compared to $36,414, a difference of 5.6%), householder income under 25 years ($55,158 compared to $50,757, a difference of 8.7%), and median earnings ($45,027 compared to $41,119, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.1% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 81.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 75.3%), and married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 58.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.6% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 5.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.9% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 7.1%), and single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 9.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 26.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 20.4%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.74%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 19.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 0.29%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 78.8%, a difference of 0.36%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 36.8%), married-couple households (49.1% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 20.4%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 1.4%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and average family size (3.43 compared to 3.33, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 155.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 111.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 71.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 14.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 38.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 71.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 83.7%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 23.4%), and college, under 1 year (63.9% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 42.2%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 15.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.040%), disability age 65 to 74 (24.1% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and female disability (12.4% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 2.0%).