Native Hawaiian vs Immigrants from Netherlands Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 187,036,571 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Netherlands within Native Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.010. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Native Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Immigrants from Netherlands. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Native Hawaiians corresponds to a decrease of 0.1 Immigrants from Netherlands.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Netherlands communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,017 compared to $50,458, a difference of 23.0%), median male earnings ($52,306 compared to $61,096, a difference of 16.8%), and median earnings ($45,027 compared to $50,818, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,158 compared to $52,592, a difference of 4.9%), median household income ($89,919 compared to $94,411, a difference of 5.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,149 compared to $111,982, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Netherlands communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 34.7%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.9% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 14.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (19.9% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 0.26%), single male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Netherlands communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 19.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 17.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Netherlands communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.53%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.67%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.74%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Netherlands communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 15.6%), births to unmarried women (34.3% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 14.6%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.9% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 1.2%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Netherlands communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 41.3%), no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 22.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 6.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 22.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Netherlands communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 56.9%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 52.4%), and master's degree (12.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 47.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (93.9% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.020%), 10th grade (95.0% compared to 94.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and 9th grade (95.9% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Netherlands communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 11.4%), ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.18%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 2.3%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 3.8%).