Guatemalan vs Arapaho Community Comparison
COMPARE
Guatemalan
Arapaho
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Guatemalans
Arapaho
1,497
SOCIAL INDEX
12.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
305th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,537
SOCIAL INDEX
22.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
252nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Arapaho Integration in Guatemalan Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 27,429,012 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Guatemalan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.559. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Guatemalans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.015% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Guatemalans corresponds to an increase of 15.4 Arapaho.
Guatemalan vs Arapaho Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($51,525 compared to $44,003, a difference of 17.1%), per capita income ($37,766 compared to $32,345, a difference of 16.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,705 compared to $75,945, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.6% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 3.7%), median family income ($88,295 compared to $82,064, a difference of 7.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,526 compared to $59,383, a difference of 8.9%).
Income Metric | Guatemalan | Arapaho |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $37,766 | Tragic $32,345 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $88,295 | Tragic $82,064 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $75,961 | Tragic $67,965 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $41,205 | Tragic $36,586 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,736 | Tragic $41,758 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,695 | Tragic $31,489 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,525 | Tragic $44,003 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,331 | Tragic $71,697 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $87,705 | Tragic $75,945 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,526 | Poor $59,383 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.6% | Exceptional 23.5% |
Guatemalan vs Arapaho Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.8% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 59.4%), single father poverty (16.6% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 44.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (21.4% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 1.6%), single mother poverty (32.9% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.2% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 1.8%).
Poverty Metric | Guatemalan | Arapaho |
Poverty | Tragic 15.3% | Tragic 16.3% |
Families | Tragic 11.7% | Tragic 12.7% |
Males | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Tragic 16.7% | Tragic 17.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.7% | Tragic 25.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 16.4% | Tragic 17.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.6% | Tragic 23.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 21.2% | Tragic 20.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.1% | Tragic 20.2% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.4% | Tragic 21.7% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 21.9% |
Single Females | Tragic 23.8% | Tragic 26.4% |
Single Fathers | Poor 16.6% | Tragic 24.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 32.9% | Tragic 33.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 6.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 11.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 14.8% | Poor 12.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.4% | Tragic 14.1% |
Guatemalan vs Arapaho Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 119.8%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.1% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 115.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 114.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 9.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Guatemalan | Arapaho |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 9.8% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 11.0% |
Females | Tragic 6.0% | Tragic 8.8% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 16.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 18.6% | Tragic 25.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Poor 10.5% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 15.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.0% | Tragic 12.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.1% | Tragic 10.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.3% | Tragic 6.1% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.2% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 5.3% |
Seniors > 75 | Fair 8.8% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.7% | Tragic 19.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Tragic 16.8% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 9.2% |
Guatemalan vs Arapaho Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 9.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.0% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 74.4%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.7% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (35.5% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 5.0%).
Labor Participation Metric | Guatemalan | Arapaho |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.6% | Tragic 62.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.7% | Tragic 74.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 35.5% | Excellent 37.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.3% | Tragic 73.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.7% | Tragic 76.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 83.7% | Tragic 81.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.0% | Tragic 78.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.2% | Tragic 77.1% |
Guatemalan vs Arapaho Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.1% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 26.9%), divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 21.8%), and family households with children (28.9% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.2% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 1.9%), single father households (3.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and married-couple households (43.3% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 3.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Guatemalan | Arapaho |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.2% | Exceptional 66.5% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.9% | Tragic 25.6% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.3% | Tragic 41.8% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.40 | Exceptional 3.64 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.0% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.7% | Tragic 7.1% |
Currently Married | Tragic 42.9% | Tragic 40.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Fair 12.2% | Tragic 14.8% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 37.1% | Tragic 47.1% |
Guatemalan vs Arapaho Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 49.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 34.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 11.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 31.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Guatemalan | Arapaho |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 11.0% | Exceptional 7.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Poor 89.2% | Exceptional 92.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 54.1% | Exceptional 60.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 20.1% | Exceptional 26.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.0% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Guatemalan vs Arapaho Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 64.3%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 21.0%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 2.1%), kindergarten (96.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 2.2%).
Education Level Metric | Guatemalan | Arapaho |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.5% | Average 2.1% |
Nursery School | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 98.6% |
1st Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 98.6% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Tragic 94.8% | Exceptional 98.0% |
6th Grade | Tragic 94.2% | Exceptional 97.8% |
7th Grade | Tragic 91.7% | Exceptional 96.8% |
8th Grade | Tragic 91.1% | Exceptional 96.6% |
9th Grade | Tragic 89.9% | Exceptional 95.7% |
10th Grade | Tragic 87.9% | Exceptional 94.2% |
11th Grade | Tragic 86.4% | Fair 92.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.6% | Tragic 90.5% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 82.0% | Poor 88.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 78.5% | Tragic 82.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 56.8% | Tragic 60.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 51.2% | Tragic 54.1% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.5% | Tragic 36.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 31.0% | Tragic 26.6% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.7% | Tragic 10.0% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Tragic 2.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Tragic 1.2% |
Guatemalan vs Arapaho Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 47.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 29.1%), and male disability (11.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 1.6%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 3.9%).
Disability Metric | Guatemalan | Arapaho |
Disability | Good 11.6% | Tragic 13.2% |
Males | Good 11.1% | Tragic 13.3% |
Females | Good 12.1% | Tragic 13.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Fair 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Excellent 5.5% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Excellent 6.4% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Poor 11.7% | Tragic 15.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.5% | Tragic 28.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.0% | Tragic 49.8% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Tragic 2.6% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Tragic 4.1% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.8% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Ambulatory | Fair 6.2% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.6% |