South American Indian vs Arapaho Community Comparison
COMPARE
South American Indian
Arapaho
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
South American Indians
Arapaho
4,820
SOCIAL INDEX
45.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
193rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,537
SOCIAL INDEX
22.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
252nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Arapaho Integration in South American Indian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 20,821,465 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within South American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in South American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.480% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 South American Indians corresponds to an increase of 479.7 Arapaho.
South American Indian vs Arapaho Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,206 compared to $32,345, a difference of 36.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,497 compared to $71,697, a difference of 34.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,171 compared to $75,945, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($62,215 compared to $59,383, a difference of 4.8%), wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 5.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,979 compared to $44,003, a difference of 20.4%).
Income Metric | South American Indian | Arapaho |
Per Capita Income | Good $44,206 | Tragic $32,345 |
Median Family Income | Good $103,624 | Tragic $82,064 |
Median Household Income | Excellent $87,446 | Tragic $67,965 |
Median Earnings | Good $46,952 | Tragic $36,586 |
Median Male Earnings | Average $54,508 | Tragic $41,758 |
Median Female Earnings | Good $40,019 | Tragic $31,489 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Excellent $52,979 | Tragic $44,003 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Good $96,497 | Tragic $71,697 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Good $101,171 | Tragic $75,945 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Good $62,215 | Poor $59,383 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 24.7% | Exceptional 23.5% |
South American Indian vs Arapaho Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.1% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 81.0%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 52.6%), and family poverty (9.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 38.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 1.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and single mother poverty (29.3% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 14.3%).
Poverty Metric | South American Indian | Arapaho |
Poverty | Fair 12.7% | Tragic 16.3% |
Families | Fair 9.1% | Tragic 12.7% |
Males | Fair 11.5% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Fair 13.7% | Tragic 17.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.1% | Tragic 25.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Average 13.5% | Tragic 17.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Average 17.4% | Tragic 23.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Average 16.4% | Tragic 20.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Average 16.5% | Tragic 20.2% |
Girls Under 16 years | Fair 16.8% | Tragic 21.7% |
Single Males | Exceptional 12.1% | Tragic 21.9% |
Single Females | Good 20.6% | Tragic 26.4% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.7% | Tragic 24.0% |
Single Mothers | Average 29.3% | Tragic 33.4% |
Married Couples | Fair 5.3% | Tragic 6.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Poor 11.4% | Tragic 11.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 12.9% | Poor 12.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Average 11.9% | Tragic 14.1% |
South American Indian vs Arapaho Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 139.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 130.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 126.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.77%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 5.4%).
Unemployment Metric | South American Indian | Arapaho |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.5% | Tragic 9.8% |
Males | Tragic 5.5% | Tragic 11.0% |
Females | Tragic 5.5% | Tragic 8.8% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 16.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 18.0% | Tragic 25.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.8% | Tragic 15.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Fair 5.6% | Tragic 12.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Average 4.7% | Tragic 10.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.7% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 6.1% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Fair 4.9% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.5% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Poor 5.2% | Tragic 5.3% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.2% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 7.9% | Tragic 19.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.0% | Tragic 16.8% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Fair 5.5% | Tragic 9.2% |
South American Indian vs Arapaho Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 10.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 8.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 4.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | South American Indian | Arapaho |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.0% | Tragic 62.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Excellent 79.9% | Tragic 74.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Poor 35.8% | Excellent 37.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.3% | Tragic 73.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Fair 84.5% | Tragic 76.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Average 84.7% | Tragic 81.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Good 84.5% | Tragic 78.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Good 82.9% | Tragic 77.1% |
South American Indian vs Arapaho Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 48.4%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 29.0%), and divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.6% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 2.9%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 9.4%), and married-couple households (46.0% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 10.1%).
Family Structure Metric | South American Indian | Arapaho |
Family Households | Excellent 64.6% | Exceptional 66.5% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.0% | Tragic 25.6% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 46.0% | Tragic 41.8% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.26 | Exceptional 3.64 |
Single Father Households | Excellent 2.3% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Fair 6.4% | Tragic 7.1% |
Currently Married | Poor 45.8% | Tragic 40.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.8% | Tragic 14.8% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Average 31.7% | Tragic 47.1% |
South American Indian vs Arapaho Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 64.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 49.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 38.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.0% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 5.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 11.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 38.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | South American Indian | Arapaho |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 7.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.0% | Exceptional 92.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 53.9% | Exceptional 60.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.1% | Exceptional 26.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Average 6.3% | Exceptional 9.4% |
South American Indian vs Arapaho Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 69.3%), professional degree (4.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 65.4%), and master's degree (15.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 59.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.6% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.12%), high school diploma (88.5% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 0.12%), and 11th grade (92.0% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.46%).
Education Level Metric | South American Indian | Arapaho |
No Schooling Completed | Poor 2.2% | Average 2.1% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.8% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.8% | Exceptional 98.6% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.6% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.0% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 97.8% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.5% | Exceptional 96.8% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.1% | Exceptional 96.6% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.3% | Exceptional 95.7% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.1% | Exceptional 94.2% |
11th Grade | Tragic 92.0% | Fair 92.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Poor 90.6% | Tragic 90.5% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.5% | Poor 88.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.2% | Tragic 82.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Average 65.5% | Tragic 60.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Good 60.0% | Tragic 54.1% |
Associate's Degree | Good 47.4% | Tragic 36.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Excellent 39.3% | Tragic 26.6% |
Master's Degree | Excellent 15.9% | Tragic 10.0% |
Professional Degree | Excellent 4.8% | Tragic 2.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Excellent 2.0% | Tragic 1.2% |
South American Indian vs Arapaho Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 45.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.9% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 38.1%), and male disability (10.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 4.0%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 4.9%), and disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 5.7%).
Disability Metric | South American Indian | Arapaho |
Disability | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 13.2% |
Males | Excellent 10.9% | Tragic 13.3% |
Females | Exceptional 11.8% | Tragic 13.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.3% | Fair 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Excellent 5.5% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Excellent 6.4% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Excellent 10.9% | Tragic 15.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 23.1% | Tragic 28.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Good 47.1% | Tragic 49.8% |
Vision | Average 2.2% | Tragic 2.6% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.9% | Tragic 4.1% |
Cognitive | Poor 17.5% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Excellent 2.4% | Tragic 2.6% |