Czechoslovakian vs Arapaho Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 27,128,687 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.455. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.304% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 304.4 Arapaho.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,806 compared to $32,345, a difference of 35.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,387 compared to $75,945, a difference of 33.5%), and median male earnings ($55,382 compared to $41,758, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($60,581 compared to $59,383, a difference of 2.0%), householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $44,003, a difference of 16.4%), and wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 20.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.4% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 63.9%), family poverty (8.0% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 58.1%), and married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 50.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 12.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.9% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 16.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 23.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 147.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 137.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 129.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 5.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 17.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 12.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 11.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 3.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 47.0%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 25.0%), and single mother households (5.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.6% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 2.9%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 5.8%), and married-couple households (48.5% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 16.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 31.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 21.7%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.43%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 0.75%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 53.5%), professional degree (4.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 46.3%), and master's degree (14.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 45.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.0%), 5th grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.0%), and 6th grade (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 27.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 25.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.5%), female disability (12.7% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 4.6%).