Mexican vs Arapaho Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,527,282 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Mexican communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.241. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mexicans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Mexicans corresponds to a decrease of 1.5 Arapaho.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Mexican and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,816 compared to $75,945, a difference of 14.3%), householder income under 25 years ($49,989 compared to $44,003, a difference of 13.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,427 compared to $71,697, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($85,618 compared to $82,064, a difference of 4.3%), per capita income ($34,559 compared to $32,345, a difference of 6.8%), and median female earnings ($33,664 compared to $31,489, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Mexican and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (14.0% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 56.9%), single father poverty (16.1% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 48.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (33.6% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 0.37%), child poverty under the age of 16 (20.7% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 0.51%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (20.7% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Mexican and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 114.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 109.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 104.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Mexican and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 7.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (81.6% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 0.53%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Mexican and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 27.6%), family households with children (31.4% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 22.7%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (3.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 2.5%), family households (69.0% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 3.8%), and average family size (3.48 compared to 3.64, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Mexican and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (24.7% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 7.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 4.6%), and no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.0% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.35%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.7% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Mexican and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 56.6%), college, 1 year or more (49.2% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 10.0%), and high school diploma (81.4% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.38%), bachelor's degree (27.1% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and nursery school (96.8% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Mexican and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 29.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 22.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.4% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 0.43%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability age over 75 (51.1% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 2.6%).