Immigrants from Guatemala vs Arapaho Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Guatemala
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Arapaho
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Guatemala

Arapaho

Poor
Fair
1,504
SOCIAL INDEX
12.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
304th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,537
SOCIAL INDEX
22.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
252nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Arapaho Integration in Immigrants from Guatemala Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 26,379,123 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Immigrant from Guatemala communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.354. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Guatemala within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.010% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Guatemala corresponds to an increase of 9.9 Arapaho.
Immigrants from Guatemala Integration in Arapaho Communities

Immigrants from Guatemala vs Arapaho Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($51,447 compared to $44,003, a difference of 16.9%), per capita income ($37,550 compared to $32,345, a difference of 16.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,573 compared to $75,945, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 4.5%), median family income ($87,191 compared to $82,064, a difference of 6.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,950 compared to $59,383, a difference of 10.1%).
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Arapaho Income
Income MetricImmigrants from GuatemalaArapaho
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,550
Tragic
$32,345
Median Family Income
Tragic
$87,191
Tragic
$82,064
Median Household Income
Tragic
$75,123
Tragic
$67,965
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,851
Tragic
$36,586
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,244
Tragic
$41,758
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,444
Tragic
$31,489
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,447
Tragic
$44,003
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$81,341
Tragic
$71,697
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,573
Tragic
$75,945
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,950
Poor
$59,383
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.5%
Exceptional
23.5%

Immigrants from Guatemala vs Arapaho Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.8% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 59.4%), single father poverty (16.6% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 44.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (33.3% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 0.39%), child poverty among girls under 16 (21.9% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 0.55%), and female poverty (17.0% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 2.8%).
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Arapaho Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from GuatemalaArapaho
Poverty
Tragic
15.5%
Tragic
16.3%
Families
Tragic
12.0%
Tragic
12.7%
Males
Tragic
14.0%
Tragic
15.1%
Females
Tragic
17.0%
Tragic
17.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Tragic
25.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.6%
Tragic
17.8%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
22.0%
Tragic
23.1%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.6%
Tragic
20.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.6%
Tragic
20.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.9%
Tragic
21.7%
Single Males
Tragic
13.8%
Tragic
21.9%
Single Females
Tragic
24.1%
Tragic
26.4%
Single Fathers
Poor
16.6%
Tragic
24.0%
Single Mothers
Tragic
33.3%
Tragic
33.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
7.2%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
13.8%
Tragic
11.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.1%
Poor
12.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.6%
Tragic
14.1%

Immigrants from Guatemala vs Arapaho Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.6% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 120.2%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.2% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 114.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 113.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.73%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 7.4%).
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Arapaho Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from GuatemalaArapaho
Unemployment
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
9.8%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
11.0%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
8.8%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
16.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.7%
Tragic
25.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Poor
10.5%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.2%
Tragic
15.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
12.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.2%
Tragic
10.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.9%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
6.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
5.3%
Seniors > 75
Good
8.7%
Exceptional
8.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.6%
Tragic
19.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.4%
Tragic
16.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
9.2%

Immigrants from Guatemala vs Arapaho Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 9.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 74.4%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.7% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.1% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 5.2%).
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Arapaho Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from GuatemalaArapaho
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.6%
Tragic
62.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.7%
Tragic
74.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
35.3%
Excellent
37.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Good
75.3%
Tragic
73.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.6%
Tragic
76.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.7%
Tragic
81.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.9%
Tragic
78.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.1%
Tragic
77.1%

Immigrants from Guatemala vs Arapaho Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.5% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 25.7%), divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 21.6%), and family households with children (28.8% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 2.2%), married-couple households (42.8% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and single father households (3.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 3.1%).
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Arapaho Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from GuatemalaArapaho
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Exceptional
66.5%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.8%
Tragic
25.6%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.8%
Tragic
41.8%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.41
Exceptional
3.64
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.0%
Tragic
2.9%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.7%
Tragic
7.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
42.6%
Tragic
40.5%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.2%
Tragic
14.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
37.5%
Tragic
47.1%

Immigrants from Guatemala vs Arapaho Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 52.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 37.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 34.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 4.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 12.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 34.0%).
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Arapaho Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from GuatemalaArapaho
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
7.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.9%
Exceptional
92.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.5%
Exceptional
60.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Good
19.7%
Exceptional
26.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Exceptional
9.4%

Immigrants from Guatemala vs Arapaho Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 69.9%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 19.8%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 2.2%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and 1st grade (96.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 2.3%).
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Arapaho Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from GuatemalaArapaho
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.6%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.4%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.4%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.2%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Tragic
95.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Tragic
95.1%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Tragic
94.6%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Tragic
91.3%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Tragic
90.7%
Exceptional
96.6%
9th Grade
Tragic
89.4%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Tragic
87.4%
Exceptional
94.2%
11th Grade
Tragic
85.8%
Fair
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.0%
Tragic
90.5%
High School Diploma
Tragic
81.4%
Poor
88.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
77.9%
Tragic
82.8%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
56.2%
Tragic
60.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
50.7%
Tragic
54.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.1%
Tragic
36.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.8%
Tragic
26.6%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.6%
Tragic
10.0%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.4%
Tragic
2.9%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Tragic
1.2%

Immigrants from Guatemala vs Arapaho Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 48.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.6% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 29.6%), and male disability (11.0% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.1% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 1.4%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 3.9%).
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Arapaho Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from GuatemalaArapaho
Disability
Good
11.6%
Tragic
13.2%
Males
Good
11.0%
Tragic
13.3%
Females
Good
12.1%
Tragic
13.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Excellent
5.5%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Poor
11.6%
Tragic
15.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.7%
Tragic
28.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.1%
Tragic
49.8%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
4.1%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.7%
Exceptional
16.8%
Ambulatory
Fair
6.2%
Tragic
7.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.6%