Fijian vs Arapaho Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 13,883,900 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Fijian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.056. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Fijians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Fijians corresponds to a decrease of 1.1 Arapaho.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Fijian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($50,132 compared to $44,003, a difference of 13.9%), per capita income ($36,690 compared to $32,345, a difference of 13.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,187 compared to $75,945, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 2.4%), householder income over 65 years ($56,768 compared to $59,383, a difference of 4.6%), and median family income ($87,387 compared to $82,064, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Fijian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.8% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 58.9%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 52.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (31.6% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 5.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 7.9%), and receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Fijian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 155.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 154.3%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 149.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 8.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 23.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 29.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Fijian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 8.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 8.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.4% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Fijian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.3% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 46.0%), divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 17.3%), and currently married (46.3% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 0.87%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and single father households (3.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 29.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 19.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 4.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 19.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Fijian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 17.8%), bachelor's degree (28.7% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 7.9%), and college, 1 year or more (51.3% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 19.3%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 17.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.2% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (13.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 0.44%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 1.6%).