Immigrants from Liberia vs Arapaho Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 18,702,479 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Immigrant from Liberia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.572. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Liberia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.021% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Liberia corresponds to a decrease of 20.9 Arapaho.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in median female earnings ($37,970 compared to $31,489, a difference of 20.6%), per capita income ($38,165 compared to $32,345, a difference of 18.0%), and median earnings ($42,923 compared to $36,586, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,981 compared to $44,003, a difference of 9.0%), householder income over 65 years ($53,967 compared to $59,383, a difference of 10.0%), and median household income ($74,896 compared to $67,965, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.7% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 72.7%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 51.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.85%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.3% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 4.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 126.9%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.0% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 120.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 114.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 3.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 21.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (85.9% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 12.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (41.5% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 11.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.7% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 25.2%), single mother households (8.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 22.5%), and divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (41.8% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 3.0%), married-couple households (40.3% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 3.7%), and family households (62.0% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 74.6%), no vehicles in household (12.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 66.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 54.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.8% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 5.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.3% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 17.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 54.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 27.6%), bachelor's degree (33.5% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 26.0%), and master's degree (12.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.4% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.10%), high school diploma (88.2% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 0.45%), and 11th grade (91.9% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 46.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 28.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.2% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 0.44%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.63%), and female disability (12.9% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 1.5%).