Immigrants from Latin America vs Arapaho Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 28,616,551 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Immigrant from Latin America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.270. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Latin America within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Latin America corresponds to an increase of 3.1 Arapaho.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($51,387 compared to $44,003, a difference of 16.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,219 compared to $75,945, a difference of 14.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,166 compared to $71,697, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.7% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 1.1%), median family income ($86,989 compared to $82,064, a difference of 6.0%), and median household income ($75,420 compared to $67,965, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.5% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 62.2%), single father poverty (16.4% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 46.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (20.5% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 1.3%), child poverty among boys under 16 (20.6% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and single mother poverty (32.4% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.6% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 121.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 108.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.4% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 107.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.27%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.9% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 9.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 8.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.8% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 0.37%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.1% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.1% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 26.8%), divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 19.3%), and family households with children (29.7% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.2% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 1.1%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 4.0%), and average family size (3.42 compared to 3.64, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 40.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 31.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 10.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 28.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 56.2%), professional degree (3.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 14.7%), and bachelor's degree (30.1% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.7% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.9%), kindergarten (96.7% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and 1st grade (96.7% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 46.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.5% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 31.1%), and male disability (11.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.21%), disability age over 75 (49.5% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 0.57%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 4.1%).