Crow vs Arapaho Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 9,784,125 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.179. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.014% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to a decrease of 14.4 Arapaho.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.1% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 23.1%), householder income over 65 years ($49,234 compared to $59,383, a difference of 20.6%), and median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $31,489, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,337 compared to $71,697, a difference of 0.50%), median male earnings ($42,434 compared to $41,758, a difference of 1.6%), and per capita income ($31,729 compared to $32,345, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (9.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 45.6%), child poverty under the age of 5 (31.0% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 34.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (33.2% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 5.1%), single male poverty (23.3% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 6.0%), and single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 15.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 220.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 198.3%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (13.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 83.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 0.070%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 3.1%), and male unemployment (10.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 7.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (73.3% compared to 74.4%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 21.1%), births to unmarried women (40.4% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 16.7%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (40.4% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 0.43%), married-couple households (41.4% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and family households (65.3% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 50.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 20.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 3.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 8.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 17.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 28.4%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 26.6%), and professional degree (3.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (88.4% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 0.17%), college, under 1 year (60.2% compared to 60.3%, a difference of 0.27%), and 9th grade (96.1% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 16.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 13.9%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (4.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 0.39%), disability age over 75 (49.6% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 0.44%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.9% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 0.54%).