Immigrants vs Arapaho Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,664,176 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Immigrant communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.230. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants corresponds to a decrease of 2.7 Arapaho.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,010 compared to $32,345, a difference of 33.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($94,423 compared to $71,697, a difference of 31.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,943 compared to $75,945, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($59,656 compared to $59,383, a difference of 0.46%), wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 7.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,201 compared to $44,003, a difference of 20.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.7% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 73.4%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 51.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.3% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 30.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 6.6%), receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 8.5%), and married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 143.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 124.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.9% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 121.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 4.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 9.6%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 7.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.7% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 0.48%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.7% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 44.2%), divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 25.8%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.1% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 0.50%), single mother households (6.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 3.9%), and average family size (3.33 compared to 3.64, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 58.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 37.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 32.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 10.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 32.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 56.7%), professional degree (4.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 51.7%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 46.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (82.6% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.23%), nursery school (97.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and kindergarten (97.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 46.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 40.7%), and male disability (10.8% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 2.2%), disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 3.4%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 5.1%).