Egyptian vs Arapaho Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 23,770,706 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Egyptian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.181. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Egyptians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.022% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Egyptians corresponds to a decrease of 21.9 Arapaho.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($48,358 compared to $32,345, a difference of 49.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($112,256 compared to $75,945, a difference of 47.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($105,282 compared to $71,697, a difference of 46.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($65,441 compared to $59,383, a difference of 10.2%), wage/income gap (26.6% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 13.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,444 compared to $44,003, a difference of 23.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.5% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 90.3%), single father poverty (14.7% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 63.6%), and family poverty (8.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 55.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 4.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 11.3%), and single mother poverty (26.9% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 24.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 168.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 142.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 141.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 0.86%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 11.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 8.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.2% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 66.8%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 40.4%), and divorced or separated (11.1% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.4% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 1.7%), family households with children (28.6% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 11.8%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.64, a difference of 12.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 61.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 52.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 39.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.2% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 5.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 11.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 39.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 87.5%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 82.9%), and master's degree (17.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 76.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.0% compared to 94.2%, a difference of 0.20%), 4th grade (97.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.62%), and 3rd grade (97.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 55.4%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 52.6%), and vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 35.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.96%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 6.4%), and disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 8.0%).