Sioux vs Arapaho Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 26,684,112 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Sioux communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.323. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sioux within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.323% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sioux corresponds to a decrease of 322.9 Arapaho.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Sioux and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($52,509 compared to $59,383, a difference of 13.1%), median female earnings ($35,063 compared to $31,489, a difference of 11.4%), and median male earnings ($45,566 compared to $41,758, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($67,792 compared to $67,965, a difference of 0.25%), median family income ($82,386 compared to $82,064, a difference of 0.39%), and wage/income gap (24.3% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Sioux and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (8.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 32.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 31.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (23.9% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 0.41%), single male poverty (22.2% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.6% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 13.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Sioux and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (11.5% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 66.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (8.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 59.8%), and unemployment (7.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 33.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (14.2% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (14.4% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 13.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Sioux and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.5% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 11.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (79.7% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.2% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (61.8% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 0.49%), in labor force | age 20-64 (75.0% compared to 74.4%, a difference of 0.83%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Sioux and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 19.3%), births to unmarried women (41.0% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 14.9%), and single father households (3.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (41.5% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 0.74%), family households (64.6% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 3.0%), and average family size (3.52 compared to 3.64, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Sioux and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 36.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 17.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 2.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.8% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 6.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 17.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Sioux and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 26.3%), no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 18.9%), and professional degree (3.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.0%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.0%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Sioux and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 43.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 26.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.7% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 0.14%), female disability (12.9% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 0.75%), and cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 2.6%).