Nicaraguan vs Arapaho Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,374,601 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Nicaraguan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.670. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Nicaraguans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.198% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Nicaraguans corresponds to an increase of 198.4 Arapaho.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($87,751 compared to $71,697, a difference of 22.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($92,554 compared to $75,945, a difference of 21.9%), and per capita income ($39,372 compared to $32,345, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.4% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 0.14%), householder income over 65 years ($54,474 compared to $59,383, a difference of 9.0%), and median family income ($92,231 compared to $82,064, a difference of 12.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.4% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 77.1%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 50.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.1% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 39.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (6.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.9%), child poverty among boys under 16 (18.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 9.9%), and single mother poverty (29.8% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 163.2%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 134.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 130.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 13.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.4% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 15.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.1% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 8.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.2% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 0.85%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.9% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.6% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 28.7%), divorced or separated (13.0% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 13.9%), and family households with children (28.4% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.4% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 1.3%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and married-couple households (45.2% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 34.5%), no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 31.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 7.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 27.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 39.7%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 36.9%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (53.9% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 0.47%), nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 52.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 47.5%), and male disability (10.7% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.72%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 3.2%).