Central American Indian vs Arapaho Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 25,729,852 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Central American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.279. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Central American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.040% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Central American Indians corresponds to an increase of 39.7 Arapaho.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,699 compared to $32,345, a difference of 16.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,355 compared to $71,697, a difference of 14.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,764 compared to $75,945, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.7% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 3.5%), median family income ($88,034 compared to $82,064, a difference of 7.3%), and median household income ($74,847 compared to $67,965, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 30.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 29.7%), and single male poverty (17.2% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (15.3% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 1.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.2% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 2.5%), and poverty (16.7% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 99.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.6% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 98.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.9% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 94.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 9.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.4% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.5% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.7% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.4% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (39.0% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 20.9%), divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 16.9%), and family households with children (27.9% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.2% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 2.0%), married-couple households (43.8% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 4.6%), and single mother households (7.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 81.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 44.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 38.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.7% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 6.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.5% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 14.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 38.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 35.1%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 31.0%), and professional degree (3.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (53.5% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 1.1%), nursery school (97.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and kindergarten (97.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 31.2%), hearing disability (3.3% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 27.4%), and vision disability (3.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (13.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 0.43%), ambulatory disability (7.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 0.73%), and disability age over 75 (50.5% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 1.4%).