Malaysian vs Arapaho Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 23,365,147 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Malaysian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.357. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Malaysians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.034% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Malaysians corresponds to an increase of 34.5 Arapaho.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($94,517 compared to $75,945, a difference of 24.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,291 compared to $71,697, a difference of 23.2%), and median male earnings ($50,772 compared to $41,758, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($58,244 compared to $59,383, a difference of 2.0%), wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 6.7%), and median family income ($95,230 compared to $82,064, a difference of 16.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.6% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 73.9%), single father poverty (14.9% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 60.5%), and family poverty (9.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 31.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 7.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 7.9%), and receiving food stamps (12.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 145.7%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 133.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 133.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 10.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 10.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 7.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 74.4%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.2% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 39.1%), divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 19.8%), and family households with children (29.8% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 0.92%), single mother households (7.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 22.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 16.9%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.44%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 0.67%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 31.4%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 24.8%), and bachelor's degree (32.9% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (83.3% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.63%), 12th grade, no diploma (89.2% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and nursery school (97.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 30.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 23.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.5% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 0.72%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 1.7%).