Nepalese vs Arapaho Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 8,018,168 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Nepalese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.205. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Nepalese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.254% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Nepalese corresponds to a decrease of 254.3 Arapaho.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Nepalese and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,498 compared to $71,697, a difference of 27.6%), householder income under 25 years ($54,472 compared to $44,003, a difference of 23.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,355 compared to $75,945, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($58,761 compared to $59,383, a difference of 1.1%), wage/income gap (22.2% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 5.6%), and median family income ($94,153 compared to $82,064, a difference of 14.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Nepalese and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.6% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 89.3%), single father poverty (14.4% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 66.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (18.3% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.52%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.61%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Nepalese and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 147.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 118.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 116.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 8.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 15.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Nepalese and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.5% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 11.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 8.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.4% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 0.91%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.7% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.8% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Nepalese and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.5% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 40.5%), family households with children (30.5% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 19.4%), and divorced or separated (12.5% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.2% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 1.1%), single mother households (7.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 4.9%), and average family size (3.42 compared to 3.64, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Nepalese and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 6.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 6.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.6% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.10%), no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.57%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Nepalese and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 80.8%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 12.6%), and bachelor's degree (29.9% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (81.9% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 1.0%), college, 1 year or more (54.9% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and nursery school (96.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Nepalese and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.97% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 30.7%), hearing disability (3.3% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 25.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.8% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 0.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (28.0% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 0.23%), and female disability (13.3% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 2.1%).