Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Arapaho Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,174,980 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Immigrant from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.478. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South Eastern Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South Eastern Asia corresponds to a decrease of 4.7 Arapaho.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($100,283 compared to $71,697, a difference of 39.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,109 compared to $75,945, a difference of 39.7%), and median household income ($91,541 compared to $67,965, a difference of 34.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.8% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 5.7%), householder income over 65 years ($64,089 compared to $59,383, a difference of 7.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,714 compared to $44,003, a difference of 26.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.4% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 91.7%), single father poverty (14.4% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 67.0%), and family poverty (8.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 48.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 3.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 7.6%), and single mother poverty (27.1% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 23.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 165.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 137.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 130.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 5.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 10.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 7.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 55.2%), divorced or separated (11.4% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 29.8%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.5% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 1.5%), average family size (3.36 compared to 3.64, a difference of 8.3%), and single mother households (6.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 12.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 17.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 14.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.6% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 1.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 13.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 47.4%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 40.3%), and master's degree (14.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 39.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (89.6% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.97%), nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and kindergarten (97.1% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 42.5%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 40.3%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 4.9%).