Chilean vs Arapaho Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chilean
Arapaho
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chileans
Arapaho
8,759
SOCIAL INDEX
85.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
51st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,537
SOCIAL INDEX
22.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
252nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Arapaho Integration in Chilean Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 23,357,696 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Chilean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.668. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.083% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chileans corresponds to an increase of 83.4 Arapaho.
Chilean vs Arapaho Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chilean and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,459 compared to $32,345, a difference of 43.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,611 compared to $75,945, a difference of 40.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,900 compared to $71,697, a difference of 39.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($63,957 compared to $59,383, a difference of 7.7%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 12.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $44,003, a difference of 20.9%).
Income Metric | Chilean | Arapaho |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,459 | Tragic $32,345 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $108,429 | Tragic $82,064 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $90,605 | Tragic $67,965 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,504 | Tragic $36,586 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $56,973 | Tragic $41,758 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $40,757 | Tragic $31,489 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,185 | Tragic $44,003 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $99,900 | Tragic $71,697 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $106,611 | Tragic $75,945 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $63,957 | Poor $59,383 |
Wage/Income Gap | Fair 26.3% | Exceptional 23.5% |
Chilean vs Arapaho Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chilean and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.9% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 84.1%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 52.7%), and family poverty (8.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 49.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.50%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.2%), and single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 19.9%).
Poverty Metric | Chilean | Arapaho |
Poverty | Excellent 11.8% | Tragic 16.3% |
Families | Excellent 8.5% | Tragic 12.7% |
Males | Excellent 10.7% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Excellent 12.9% | Tragic 17.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.1% | Tragic 25.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.8% | Tragic 17.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.6% | Tragic 23.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Tragic 20.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.0% | Tragic 20.2% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.1% | Tragic 21.7% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 21.9% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.9% | Tragic 26.4% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.7% | Tragic 24.0% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.9% | Tragic 33.4% |
Married Couples | Excellent 4.9% | Tragic 6.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Fair 11.2% | Tragic 11.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Poor 12.6% | Poor 12.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 11.0% | Tragic 14.1% |
Chilean vs Arapaho Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chilean and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 164.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 146.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 137.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 4.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Chilean | Arapaho |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 9.8% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 11.0% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 8.8% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 16.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Tragic 25.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Excellent 6.5% | Tragic 15.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 12.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 10.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 6.1% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 5.3% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.4% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.2% | Tragic 19.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Excellent 8.8% | Tragic 16.8% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.3% | Tragic 9.2% |
Chilean vs Arapaho Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chilean and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 11.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 8.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 0.99%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 4.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chilean | Arapaho |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.0% | Tragic 62.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.1% | Tragic 74.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Poor 35.8% | Excellent 37.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Tragic 73.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Excellent 85.0% | Tragic 76.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 84.9% | Tragic 81.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Tragic 78.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.4% | Tragic 77.1% |
Chilean vs Arapaho Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chilean and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.7% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 53.6%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 31.0%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.2% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 2.0%), family households with children (28.1% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 10.0%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.64, a difference of 12.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Chilean | Arapaho |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.2% | Exceptional 66.5% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.1% | Tragic 25.6% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.5% | Tragic 41.8% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Exceptional 3.64 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Good 6.1% | Tragic 7.1% |
Currently Married | Good 47.0% | Tragic 40.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 12.0% | Tragic 14.8% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Good 30.7% | Tragic 47.1% |
Chilean vs Arapaho Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 46.2%), no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 34.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 2.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 7.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 34.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chilean | Arapaho |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.9% | Exceptional 7.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 90.2% | Exceptional 92.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 56.1% | Exceptional 60.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Good 19.7% | Exceptional 26.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.4% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Chilean vs Arapaho Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chilean and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 84.5%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 82.9%), and master's degree (16.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 69.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.9% compared to 94.2%, a difference of 0.31%), 11th grade (92.9% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.54%), and 4th grade (97.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.61%).
Education Level Metric | Chilean | Arapaho |
No Schooling Completed | Good 2.0% | Average 2.1% |
Nursery School | Average 98.0% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Average 98.0% | Exceptional 98.6% |
1st Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.6% |
2nd Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Average 97.8% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Average 97.5% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Average 97.3% | Exceptional 98.0% |
6th Grade | Average 97.1% | Exceptional 97.8% |
7th Grade | Average 96.0% | Exceptional 96.8% |
8th Grade | Average 95.7% | Exceptional 96.6% |
9th Grade | Good 95.0% | Exceptional 95.7% |
10th Grade | Good 93.9% | Exceptional 94.2% |
11th Grade | Excellent 92.9% | Fair 92.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Excellent 91.7% | Tragic 90.5% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.6% | Poor 88.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Excellent 86.6% | Tragic 82.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 67.6% | Tragic 60.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.0% | Tragic 54.1% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 49.4% | Tragic 36.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 41.2% | Tragic 26.6% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 16.9% | Tragic 10.0% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 2.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 1.2% |
Chilean vs Arapaho Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 47.1%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 44.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.0% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 0.70%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 7.2%).
Disability Metric | Chilean | Arapaho |
Disability | Exceptional 11.1% | Tragic 13.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 13.3% |
Females | Exceptional 11.5% | Tragic 13.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Poor 1.3% | Fair 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 15.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.0% | Tragic 28.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.5% | Tragic 49.8% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 2.6% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.9% | Tragic 4.1% |
Cognitive | Excellent 17.0% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.6% |