Canadian vs Arapaho Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 28,251,573 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.831. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.073% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Canadians corresponds to an increase of 73.0 Arapaho.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Canadian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,858 compared to $32,345, a difference of 41.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,560 compared to $75,945, a difference of 37.7%), and median male earnings ($57,286 compared to $41,758, a difference of 37.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($62,230 compared to $59,383, a difference of 4.8%), householder income under 25 years ($52,336 compared to $44,003, a difference of 18.9%), and wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 20.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Canadian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.3% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 64.5%), family poverty (8.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 54.5%), and married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 44.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 12.8%), single mother poverty (29.3% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 14.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 17.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Canadian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 143.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 132.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 125.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 9.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 20.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Canadian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 10.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 7.8%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (40.1% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Canadian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.9% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 47.5%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 27.3%), and single mother households (5.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 3.2%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 5.9%), and married-couple households (48.2% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 15.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 36.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 26.0%), and no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.99%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 13.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Canadian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 70.7%), professional degree (4.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 62.6%), and master's degree (15.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 56.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (98.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.090%), 7th grade (96.9% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.090%), and 6th grade (97.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 28.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 25.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.060%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and female disability (12.6% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 3.4%).