Ugandan vs Arapaho Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 16,697,111 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Ugandan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.131. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ugandans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.118% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ugandans corresponds to an increase of 117.5 Arapaho.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,047 compared to $32,345, a difference of 39.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,472 compared to $75,945, a difference of 36.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,667 compared to $71,697, a difference of 34.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.1% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 2.5%), householder income over 65 years ($61,177 compared to $59,383, a difference of 3.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,923 compared to $44,003, a difference of 15.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.3% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 78.1%), single father poverty (16.3% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 47.5%), and family poverty (9.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 36.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.9% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 6.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.1% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 14.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 161.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 151.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 126.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 4.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 15.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (85.9% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 12.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 9.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.1% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 56.6%), divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 25.8%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (43.8% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 4.8%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 7.3%), and family households (61.7% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 63.4%), no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 55.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 48.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 4.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 12.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 48.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 90.8%), professional degree (5.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 77.9%), and master's degree (17.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 71.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.0% compared to 94.2%, a difference of 0.18%), 11th grade (92.9% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.51%), and 4th grade (97.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 44.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 33.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 2.3%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 7.6%), and cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 9.0%).