Immigrants from Kuwait vs Arapaho Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 17,513,341 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Immigrant from Kuwait communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.611. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Kuwait within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.195% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Kuwait corresponds to an increase of 194.5 Arapaho.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kuwait and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,543 compared to $32,345, a difference of 43.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,285 compared to $75,945, a difference of 40.0%), and median male earnings ($57,562 compared to $41,758, a difference of 37.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($64,433 compared to $59,383, a difference of 8.5%), householder income under 25 years ($48,126 compared to $44,003, a difference of 9.4%), and wage/income gap (26.6% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 13.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kuwait and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.9% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 69.7%), single father poverty (16.0% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 49.6%), and family poverty (8.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 45.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 9.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (23.0% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 9.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 14.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kuwait and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 174.8%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (5.9% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 160.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 158.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 5.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 8.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 16.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kuwait and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 10.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 8.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 0.89%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 0.99%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kuwait and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.8% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 63.8%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 40.4%), and divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.4% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 6.6%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 7.6%), and married-couple households (46.0% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kuwait and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 51.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 38.4%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.8% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 7.9%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 27.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kuwait and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 119.0%), professional degree (5.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 99.7%), and master's degree (18.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 85.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.4% compared to 94.2%, a difference of 0.26%), 9th grade (95.4% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 0.33%), and 4th grade (97.7% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kuwait and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 50.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 47.6%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 3.8%), disability age over 75 (46.4% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 7.3%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 7.3%).