Immigrants from Israel vs Arapaho Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 21,163,853 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Immigrant from Israel communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.886. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Israel within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.254% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Israel corresponds to an increase of 1,254.5 Arapaho.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($57,384 compared to $32,345, a difference of 77.4%), median male earnings ($68,716 compared to $41,758, a difference of 64.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($117,219 compared to $71,697, a difference of 63.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($69,857 compared to $59,383, a difference of 17.6%), wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 20.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,913 compared to $44,003, a difference of 27.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.1% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 81.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.9% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 55.0%), and family poverty (8.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 53.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 4.7%), and married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 22.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 190.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 135.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 130.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.95%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 5.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 22.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 10.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (25.1% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 87.3%), single father households (1.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 61.6%), and single mother households (5.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 41.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.4% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 4.8%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 7.1%), and average family size (3.22 compared to 3.64, a difference of 13.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 111.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 95.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 69.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.5% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 9.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (49.2% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 22.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 69.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (7.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 173.2%), doctorate degree (3.0% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 161.2%), and master's degree (22.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 126.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.4% compared to 94.2%, a difference of 0.18%), 4th grade (97.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.50%), and 9th grade (95.3% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.6% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 74.9%), hearing disability (2.6% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 56.7%), and vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 42.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 2.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 5.0%), and disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 8.6%).