White/Caucasian vs Arapaho Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,776,884 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within White/Caucasian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.336. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Whites/Caucasians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.021% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Whites/Caucasians corresponds to a decrease of 20.6 Arapaho.

When considering income, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($42,180 compared to $32,345, a difference of 30.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,091 compared to $75,945, a difference of 29.2%), and median male earnings ($53,925 compared to $41,758, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($58,847 compared to $59,383, a difference of 0.91%), householder income under 25 years ($50,336 compared to $44,003, a difference of 14.4%), and median female earnings ($37,531 compared to $31,489, a difference of 19.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (14.5% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 51.4%), family poverty (8.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 44.3%), and married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 36.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (31.2% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 7.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 11.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 15.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 127.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 125.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.9% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 123.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 9.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 24.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.3% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 10.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 9.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.9% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 41.6%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 21.4%), and currently married (48.6% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.1% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 2.2%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 7.4%), and average family size (3.14 compared to 3.64, a difference of 15.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 27.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 17.1%), and no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.1% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.41%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.8% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 0.97%), and no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 50.5%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 41.7%), and master's degree (13.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.040%), 6th grade (97.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.050%), and 9th grade (95.8% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 30.9%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 30.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.6% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.82%), female disability (13.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability (13.0% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 1.5%).