Slovak vs Arapaho Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 26,591,917 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Slovak communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.021. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Slovaks within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Slovaks corresponds to a decrease of 2.7 Arapaho.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Slovak and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,229 compared to $32,345, a difference of 36.7%), median male earnings ($56,306 compared to $41,758, a difference of 34.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,029 compared to $75,945, a difference of 33.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($59,039 compared to $59,383, a difference of 0.58%), householder income under 25 years ($49,753 compared to $44,003, a difference of 13.1%), and wage/income gap (28.9% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 23.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Slovak and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 63.2%), family poverty (7.9% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 60.1%), and single male poverty (14.1% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 55.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.4% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 10.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 20.5%), and single father poverty (19.3% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 24.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Slovak and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 124.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.5% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 123.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 120.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 9.1%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 26.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Slovak and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.6% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 14.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.8% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 12.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.9% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.7% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Slovak and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.4% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 41.1%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 29.6%), and single mother households (5.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (25.7% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 0.53%), family households (63.3% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 5.0%), and married-couple households (47.6% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 13.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Slovak and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 48.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 31.7%), and no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.90%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 3.9%), and no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 12.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Slovak and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 56.8%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 54.4%), and master's degree (14.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 49.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.7% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.10%), 1st grade (98.7% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.10%), and nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Slovak and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 37.6%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 33.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.5% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (13.0% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 1.5%), female disability (13.3% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 2.5%).